5399f70fb174bbdb7ad6b742_kentucky_icon.svg

Lexingteam
Mid-Year Report
June 2014

Introduction: Meet the Team

53a9c1190dfd86dd31d70046_1891195_10101284008154276_1886365114_n.jpg

Lexingteam

Fellows pictured above, left to right:

Lyzi Diamond, GIS analyst and web developer
Erik Schwartz, full-stack web developer
Livien Yin, designer and front-end developer

Primary partners pictured on right:

Shaye Rabold, Policy Advisor
Derek Paulsen, Commissioner of Planning
Jamie Emmons, Chief of Staff

City of Lexington Mayor’s Office

53a9cc2964ded3de312cdd77_Education_Builds_Hope_Luncheon_Location_Pt2_7.jpg53a9cccb1735d41e21ad3400_paulsen.jpg53a9ccae64ded3de312cdd80_jamie_emmons.jpg

The Assignment

The Code for America Lexington team is partnering with Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (LFUCG) to explore neighborhood quality of life. The specific ask is to create a project that is citizen-facing, leverages existing city services, and facilitates data driven decision-making within local government. 

Guiding Principles

  1. Identify user need.
     In this case, Lexingtonian and LFUCG user needs that pertain to neighborhood quality of life.
  2. Identify a digital service or application that addresses the user need. 
    The service should accept data in standard formats. Ideally this is a well-maintained open source project or “software as a service” to minimize the amount of time spent on custom development work.
  3. Standardize the data that feeds the digital service/application.
  4. Systematize the data flows.
     Information should flow continually from the LFUCG’s daily processes into the digital service.
  5. Minimize process change.
     Whenever possible, seek to maintain or improve government staff workflow so that they are not required to jump through hoops to enable digital services/applications.

Summary

Since January, the Code for America Lexington team has been exploring neighborhood quality of life issues and indicators. In Lexington, this research was conducted mostly via one-on-one interviews, in-person user testing, and casual conversations. In addition, we have conducted research and data analysis to determine what indicates strong or weak neighborhoods. Combining issues that matter to Lexingtonians with well-understood neighborhood indicators has led us to work on a series of projects that address that intersection.

Our time in Lexington has also been spent building community around civic technology and open data. Through our institutional partnership with OpenLexington, the local Code for America Brigade, we have had the opportunity to hold events and conduct skillshares to bring together other members of the Lexington technology community, LFUCG employees who are interested in innovation, and interested and civic-minded Lexingtonians who want to make a difference in the community.

Project 1: Trash Pick-Up Notifications

“Waste Alerts,” our first project, is an opt-in texting service that sends reminders for regularly scheduled pickup. 

During our February residency in Lexington, we saw that the most common and recurring 311 calls relate to missed trash pickup. Our city partners and the LFUCG IT department similarly expressed a need to better communicate trash schedules to Lexingtonians. Given the perceived need and the available access to waste collection data, we determined trash notifications to be a compelling project area to begin experimenting with. 

Problem Statement 

There is general confusion and forgetfulness surrounding waste collection schedules for Lexingtonians who receive the city service. 

Additionally, citizens are not aware of the variety of waste-related services offered by the City, such as hazardous waste disposal, electronic recycling, free mulch giveaways, etc. The Division of Waste Management makes a great effort to get this information to citizens via mailed newsletters, social media, and traditional press releases. Another effective communication option is text notifications.

Strategy 

In order to better communicate waste-related updates to citizens and ultimately to reinforce trust in city services, we outlined the “aim for the stars” product components that a notification service could provide:

  • Notify citizens about regularly scheduled pickup times
  • Notify citizens about schedule changes
  • Notify citizens when their trash has been skipped and provide means to reschedule pickup
  • Notify citizens about special drop-offs, events, and other waste-related news

We built an MVP (minimum viable product) with the intention of creating a proof-of-concept to present to potential users and collect feedback on the value of the project’s potential features. The MVP version sends text notifications to remind users of their regularly scheduled pickup time. It includes an admin side where an administrator can send out messages to users based on their pickup days. This is particularly useful in the case of schedule changes. 

539a3f364535daef7c3f32a7_waste_notifications.png

Next Steps

On our first trip back to Lexington, we set up user interviews and demoed the project with potential users. Among our 8-person user group, we saw a unanimous disinterest in receiving waste-related notifications. The interviewees expressed a high level of satisfaction with current services and wouldn’t opt-in to the service if it was available. 

“Nope, I wouldn’t use the service. Trash is great here and schedule is my own problem.”
– user interview participant

We investigated the city's waste management software in order to see if we could send out a notification to a household with a missed pickup. We hypothesized that missed pickup notifications would be of higher value than regular schedule reminders. At this time, the waste management software is not nuanced enough to consistently register the correct household for a missed pickup.

Due to the higher priority of a neighborhood indicators dashboard, we have put this project on hold for further development. We have begun speaking with Nextdoor, a private neighborhood social media platform, which may be an excellent venue through which LFUCG can send waste notifications to residents.

Project 2: Park Search Tool

The Park Search tool allows users to search for Lexington parks based on desired amenity.

When asked what makes a strong neighborhood, an overwhelming number of our user interview participants in Lexington responded that public spaces were extremely important. During our subsequent visits, we continued to hear a strong enthusiasm for the outdoor events and park activities that the city offers.

When we brought the idea to the Parks and Recreation Department, there was an equal amount of enthusiasm for a comprehensive parks map. It quickly became clear that the project would be a quick win for both the department and Lexingtonians who want to take advantage of the city’s park services.

Problem Statement 

There is currently no park search tool to easily find Lexington parks via a comprehensive list of amenities.

Strategy 

The Parks & Recreation Department has been amazingly collaborative on this project, sharing with us a spreadsheet of the city’s parks and amenities present in each park.

Using the available spreadsheet data, we built a search tool that allows users to discover parks by filtering by multiple amenities or by park name. The search tool includes a map which displays the park search results.

“The library does an amazing job at sharing their schedule of activities. I’d love the same ability to find events and activities in our parks.”
– user interview participant

539a06984a6edaf17ceb207a_park_search.png

Next Steps

During our June trip to Lexington, we showed the project to the Parks & Recreation department to get feedback on what they believe would be a valuable and sustainable tool. Going forward, we will continue to build an interface that provides rich information to users while also creating an easy process for city staff to update the information.

The feedback informed the following user stories for next steps of the project:

  • As a Lexingtonian, I would like to see pictures of each park so I can know what to expect.
  • As a Lexingtonian, I would like to see a details page with a full description and links to additional resources for each park. 
  • As a Lexingtonian, I would like to see events that will take place at the parks I search for.
  • As an administrator, I would like park detail updates to be reflected automatically from my spreadsheet so I don’t have to create updates in more than one location.

Our primary focus will be to create an easy and automated data pipeline for the administrator to update the site with. With this pipeline, we aim to minimize the process change on the admin’s end and ensure long-term sustainability for the project. By automating the information flow from the spreadsheet to the application while utilizing open data standards, we can set a reusable foundation for future applications of parks data.

Project 3: City Events Calendar

Through interviews with community members, we found that Lexingtonians would like to know more about events in public spaces. Various city divisions facilitate events of this nature, which gives us the opportunity to unify information sources and create a centralized public events calendar.

This project neatly aligns with our guiding principles. Given that the city staff track much of their event workflow in spreadsheets, our tools are able to continually synchronize event information from many staff members to a single centralized calendar. The end result is more proactive outward communication from LFUCG and better cross-department coordination all while minimizing staff process changes.

Problem Statement 

People in Lexington would like better access to information about free or inexpensive events that take place in the city.

Strategy

53a2080c85ed6dea28beda1b_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-18%20at%202.42.33%20PM.png
  • Identify user need: 
    See problem statement.
  • Identify digital service: 
    We found a well-tested and maintained calendar application that is re-deployable and well-suited for customized functionality and design for Lexington.
  • Standardize the data: 
    A standard calendar format feeds any number of digital services such as a Lexington city events calendar.
  • Systematize data flow: 
    The event staff in the Mayor’s office and Parks Department track much of their planning process in spreadsheets that are good candidates to be connected to a standard Outlook or Google calendar.
  • Minimize process change: 
    Much of the staff event workflow is already in spreadsheets. We will write tools that connect these spreadsheets to a centralized calendar, requiring very little change on the part of staff.
539a0b2c4a6edaf17ceb20ab_calagator.png

“...something to get people to explore other neighborhoods than usual. Especially if it knows your check-ins and that you haven’t been to some cool thing.”
– user interviewee on next features

Next Steps

  • Deploy the tools that synchronize Lori Houlihan’s (Mayor’s Office) events spreadsheet with a google calendar.
  • Incorporate her feedback.
  • Deploy the spreadsheet to event planners in the Parks Department.
  • Deploy a Lexington-branded calendar application that consumes the city’s events feed
539a0ac833c21fd467401ac7_calendar.png

Project 4: Neighborhood Indicator Dashboard

In our collaborative sessions with the Mayor’s Office and Planning Division, we identified a host of interesting and useful data that has the potential to shape the way the city delivers services. The missing piece is a visualization tool that creates actionable narratives around the data.

Problem Statement 

It is difficult to understand quality of life trends in Lexington neighborhoods.

Strategy

  • Identify the data that will give staff and community members the most useful insight into neighborhood social, physical, economic, and environmental trends.
  • Transform this data to standard formats to enable the most visualization flexibility and reusability by community developers.
  • Leverage existing visualization frameworks to create compelling narratives quickly.

Next Steps

  • Work with LFUCG officials to collect and standardize high-value datasets.
  • Demo our “datasets of the week” that we have piped into the dashboard system.
  • Create sustainable data pipelines so that data remains valid and current with minimal staff overhead.
53a9c0a40dfd86dd31d70039_DashboardMock.png

Community: OpenLexington Brigade

539a42d94535daef7c3f32b0_IMG_3405.JPG

OpenLexington is one of the oldest Code for America brigades, and they have an active presence in the Lexington tech community. The brigade had published several projects prior to the fellowship, including What’s My District, an app that tells you your school district, voting districts, and other zoning information according to your home address.

Accomplishments

  • More interaction between the brigade and actors in Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government. Staff from the mayor’s office and County Council legislative aides have attended both national hacking events and promoted them through their channels. The brigade has also succeeded in working with LFUCG to get budget data and health inspection score data in order to build data visualizations and other applications.
  • A larger non-technical population at events and hack nights. CodeAcross had 40+ attendees, with approximately half working on non-technical projects.
  • A few more applications are currently in development, including Councilmatic, a County Council legislative information subscription service, and Bus Alerts, a mobile app that sends alerts when buses are arriving.

Moving forward, the brigade will continue working with the city to get more datasets on the Open Data Portal and further widen the city’s Open Data Policy.

Community: Events & Skillshare

One goal of the fellowship year is to encourage a community that embraces all facets of learning and civic technology, both inside and outside of government. In Lexington, this community has slowly and steadily grown throughout the year through events, skillshares, and casual introductions.

Girl Scouts & Mapbox

The team led a talk with a fourth- and fifth-grade Girl Scout Troop about women in technology that included a hands-on mapping exercise. By the end of the session, the girls had created web maps with their own styles and data that they could share with their families and had a firmer understanding of how to stay safe on the web.

539a468e4535daef7c3f32bb_IMG_3422.JPG

CodeAcross

February’s CodeAcross event brought together more than 40 Lexingtonians. Approximately half of the attendees self-identified as developers and half as civically-engaged citizens. Five of the attendees were government employees, which is more than had ever attended an OpenLexington event. Through specific outreach and facilitation of civic activities that did not require programming knowledge, the civic technology community grew significantly and in the direction of non-developers.

53a20f9664a4f9aa1001e10c_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-18%20at%203.15.07%20PM.png

National Day of Civic Hacking

National Day of Civic Hacking had a similar mix of technical and non-technical attendees, with the crowd undertaking several developer-focused projects as well as some non-technical endeavors. One project that the group started working on during that event, Councilmatic, has gained some traction and has the potential to be developed in conjunction with city employees.

At both CodeAcross and National Day of Civic Hacking, there was a group working on contributing edits to OpenStreetMap, a crowd-sourced map and geographic data repository. That small group has now sprung into a Lexington chapter of Maptime, a hands-on, beginner-focused meetup group focused on learning about web mapping and geospatial technology.